Why this portfolio is evidence-first
A short note on why the site emphasizes stable artifacts, limitations, and cited claims over broad branding copy.
2026-03-16 · 1 min read
Hiring loops move quickly, but diligence still matters. The site is built around a simple principle: every material claim should point to a published artifact or it should be treated as unsupported.
That means the portfolio favors:
- Case studies with explicit scope and limits
- Evidence IDs that point to stable snapshots
- An AI assistant that should answer only from the public corpus
If evidence is missing, the correct answer is not a smooth paragraph. The correct answer is: Not in my public corpus.